Slav defence, most of the open lines. Soft cover. Number of pages GM Konstantin Sakaev, twice Olympic champion, is joining the Chess Evolution team and will be publishing two books on the Slav defense. Web Forum: ChessPub Forum – Complete Slav by Sakaev.
|Published (Last):||14 February 2011|
|PDF File Size:||10.38 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.90 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Temporarily out of stock In stock.
Sakaev doesn’t even mention The problem is that sakkaev can’t see the tree after the first 15 moves so for example, about the line I have mentionned in the anti-moscow, I checked EVERY GAMES one by sakave having 2 correspondance games as White right now, and should win both, but despite that, it could be playable for Blackit took much time.
The book covers the state of theory upto July Dreev didn’t check I only could speak about the line I have analysed before with other sources or by myself, maybe there is part of the book which is better but I have the impression that I didn’t learn much not much prose, and analysis not always that profound.
I think that one thing that might be confusing is that there are several ways slva on the tournament how the gamescores are made public.
The Complete Slav – by Konstantin Sakaev | Chessdom
Na2 is interesting, and this is also the idea of both Sakaev and Burgess. Click here to email us. As for game dates not passing in correspondence, this can be chalked up to not seeing anything newer of interest at the time of writing at the time! Bg5 are vomplete deeply, namely Moscow The Main-Line, Meran, Botvinnik variation and much more.
I could compare the books in some chapters. I do appreciate when people bring games of interest to me, because I am not omniscient. Anyway, I like it!
Disappointing for readers, and perhaps misleading on the amount of lifting I did myself, but this is best filed under “There are many people I would like to thank But the last corr databases on the market should have the same games, making the work I did far much easier and quicker. Sakeav intend to ever buy vol. Needless to say some comlpete those databases are excellent and much better than ICCF archives.
Konstantin Sakaev – Complete Slav II
Paulsen is very honest about it and I find his analysis good. Well, you can be an ICCF member with a simple request, download the archives and never play a game there for the rest of your life, that’s true. Well, I sold my copy of vol. Not great coverage though imho, but not bad either. I own no one database! I don’t understand why the chess world, many autors or GM in their preparation don’t use correspondance play!! Nbd7 in the Meran.
Completr always use chesslive. The author, Konstantin Sakaev, is a strong Grandmaster and double gold medal winner with the Russian Olympiad team. I will give some examples about the parts of the analysis I know quite well.
Thanks for all the replies, and I’m sorry for the off-topic. So Sakaev’s book is more as an introduction to me, in some places there is a novelty here and here and maybe I can learn some things, but you can’t use it without working by yourself, you have to double-check, and to complete the “holes” by yourself with other sources. ICCF has stopped allowing free downloads of the slzv played on their server and restricted it to members.
Please Login or Register. Discussion forum for ChessPublishing. I will endeavor to append the analysis in an update. Curious to have the Meran and Slav and not the hybrid Anand used in the Gelfand match ie LSS is free to be a member of and play and you can get their archives there in the same manner.
Konstantin Sakaev: “Complete Slav I”
Quite popular line in former times: Paulsen’s doesn’t cover If I didn’t judge Bxc4 b5 and Anti-Meran 6. I own “the Slav” from Burgess too, and Dreev’s books.
Ludde Full Member Offline So much theory. Practical Decisions in Critical Moments. Complete Slav by Sakaev Read times. Concerning the bibliography, none of my books will have one as the analysis is mostly culled from my personal files, which invariably have unattributed analysis all over the place interested as I am in the chess than the individuals.
The variations rising after 5. Kf8 as a serious try, then I must chalk it up as an author error. What on earth were they thinking?
Also other possibilities such as 5. In such situations Sakaev decided to only describe why certain moves do not deserve to be examined deeply.